» Welcome to SlingshotOwners.com: The #1 Polaris Slingshot Forum
Welcome to SlingShotOwners.com - we offer Polaris Slingshot Forums dedicated to the Polaris Slingshot. We have many features on this website to make your experience here more enjoyable. The first step would be to REGISTER for free so you can take advantage of all the features we have to offer.
Slingshot vs Spyder vs Morgan: By the Numbers
Dec 12, 2014 - 6:21 PM - by MikeyB
By now I'm sure most of you have seen the video of the three way shootout between the Slingshot, the Can-Am and the Morgan, however have you had a look at the three by the numbers?
Slingshot: 2.3L DOHC Inline-4
Spyder: 1.3L Rotax DOHC Triple
Morgan: 1.9L Pushrod V-Twin
Bore x Stroke
Slingshot: 88 mm x 98 mm
Spyder: 84 mm x 80 mm
Morgan: 104.8 mm x 111.1 mm
Slingshot: 173 @ 6200 RPM
Spyder: 115 @ 7250 RPM
Morgan: 93 @ 5250 RPM
Slingshot: 166 ft-lb @ 4700 RPM
Spyder: 96 ft-lb @ 5000 RPM
Morgan: 103 ft-lb at 3250 RPM
Slingshot: 5 speed manual
Spyder: 6 speed manual or semi-automatic
Morgan: MAzda sourced 5 speed
Slingshot: Double wishbone with anti-roll bar
Spyder: Double A-arm with anti-roll bar
Morgan: Unequal A-arm
Slingshot: Monoshock single sided swingarm
Spyder: Monoshock swingarm
Morgan: Monoshock swingarm
Slingshot: 298mm vented discs
Spyder: 280 mm vented discs
Morgan: Brembo 270 mm discs
Slingshot: 298mm vented disc
Spyder: 270 mm disc
Morgan: 250 mm drum
Slingshot: 205/50-17 or 225/45-18
Morgan: 4.00 x 19
Slingshot: 265/35/18 or 255/35-20
Slingshot: 1725 lbs or 1745 lbs
Spyder: 850 (dry weight)
Morgan: 1212 lbs
Slingshot: 9.77 gal
Spyder: 7.1 gal
Morgan: 11 gal
3 Replies | 72 Views
Polaris Slingshot Vs. Can-Am Spyder F3 Vs. Morgan 3 Wheeler
Dec 05, 2014 - 3:58 PM - by PolarisSlingshotForumAdmin
Is This A Motorcycle Shootout?
Technically, and by that I mean according to the way in which the vehicles here are registered through the DMV (except Texas, but more on that later), each of these three-wheelers qualifies as a motorcycle. A motorcycle endorsement on your driver’s license to legally operate them is not required, and the two with seatbelts eschew helmet laws in states that have them. Still, without a more explicit category available and the law being what it is, “motorcycle” becomes the default label for this trio.
As a lover of all-things-motorcycle, with a broad motorcycling perspective, you’ll not find me disparaging anyone for constructing or owning one of these reverse trikes, a traditional trike, a sidecar or any other configuration of “motorcycle” no matter how thin the association. However, in a situation of forced attrition where my garage is bereft of Morgan 3 Wheelers, Polaris Slingshots and Can-Am Spyders you’ll always find a two-wheel motorcycle, but never the other way around. Hopefully, under no circumstances will I only have one motorcycle in the garage.
With that said, the comparison test here technically and subjectively qualifies as a motorcycle shootout – more so for some than others, but we’ve made peace with the elephant in the room. So let’s get into what we’re all here for: How ridiculously fun these things are to ride and/or drive.
The Slingshot provides the best wind protection, has adjustable seats, adjustable steering column, and cruise control. The Spyder F3 also has cruise control, but the Morgan does not.
To get the ball rolling, Chief Editor, Kevin Duke, has a few observations for those thinking the Morgan or Slingshot may be a good replacement for their Honda Civic.
“Don’t mistake these cyclecars for having car-like interior noise levels,” he says. “Not only is wind noise naturally part of the equation, but engine and driveline noise is also much more prevalent than in a normal car.”
It should also be noted that the Morgan and Polaris Slingshot, although car-like in appearance, are not endowed with the same safety standards (airbags, crumple zones, side-impact protection, etc.), installed in actual automobiles. So, any perceived safety benefit compared to a two-wheeler is minimal at best.
Duke also reminds us that “a three-wheeler results in at least one wheel hitting every bump in the road – no swerving between tire lanes as on a motorcycle, and no straddling a centralized bump as in a car.”
Nothing but analog here. “No power steering, no power brakes, skinny front tires and technologically ancient engine architecture means the Morgan is basic and elemental,” says Associate Editor Troy Siahaan.
Funny how the most expensive vehicle here, the Morgan ($78,000 as tested), is also the one lacking any of the modern technological rider aids with which the other two are so equipped. “There’s a pureness in the driving experience, where you know every input you’re giving is being delivered to the vehicle and not given by a computer’s interpretation of your demands,” says Siahaan.
“The Morgan’s steering is beautifully communicative, well-weighted and provides delicate yet clear feedback,” says Editorial Director Sean Alexander. “The 3 Wheeler’s well-sorted chassis encourages the driver to... [Read More]
2 Replies | 125 Views
Polaris Slingshot, NOT FOR WINTER
Nov 12, 2014 - 3:03 PM - by MikeyB
If you live in the midwest you will know exactly what I'm talking about. Three wheels, open cockpit and a simulacrum of a windscreen do not sound conducive to winter wonderlanding.
173 horsepowers, Slingshot Red Pearl Paint, Premium 18” Forged-Aluminum Front Wheels, a 20” Forged-Aluminum Rear Wheel, and a Media Console with a 4.3” LCD Screen, Backup Camera, 6 Speaker Audio System and Bluetooth Integration are all rendered null and void should yours end up like this one...
At least the slingshot comes with waterproof seats. Let this be a warning to all overzealous owners taking delivery...
12 Replies | 480 Views
» Search Tags for this Page
Top Poster: ThreeWheelin (307)
|Welcome to our newest member, Gofstrtad